Contractors must perform all government contracts without using overtime unless what condition is met?

Contractors must perform all government contracts without using overtime unless urgent program needs arise and it is cost-effective. This condition highlights the importance of efficiency and the need for projects to be completed within the allowed resources. When faced with urgent requirements, the use of overtime can be justified as a means to meet critical timelines or deliverables that are essential for the project's success.

In many government contracts, cost-control measures are integral to ensure taxpayer dollars are spent prudently. Therefore, if the decision to use overtime can also be demonstrated to be cost-effective, it aligns with the financial stewardship expected in government contracting. This balance allows flexibility in execution while maintaining oversight on spending, which is crucial in managing public funds.

The other choices, while seemingly plausible scenarios, do not capture the specific conditions under which overtime may be utilized according to contractual obligations. For instance, employee agreements or the existence of task delays do not inherently justify the incurrence of additional costs through overtime. Similarly, stating there is no other option available doesn't adequately address the need for both urgency and cost-effectiveness as decisive factors for using overtime. Thus, knowing the specific guidelines allows contractors to navigate the intricacies of government contracts efficiently.