In the FAR, when an imperative sentence directs action, who is responsible for the action unless another party is cited?

In the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), an imperative sentence that directs action typically designates the contracting officer (CO) as the responsible party unless another party is specifically identified. The CO plays a critical role in the acquisition process as the individual who has the authority to enter into, administer, and terminate contracts on behalf of the government. This authority, vested in the CO, establishes a clear line of responsibility and accountability for actions directed by the FAR.

This means that whenever the FAR prescribes a duty or action, it is presumed the contracting officer is responsible for ensuring compliance with that directive, unless the language of the FAR explicitly assigns the responsibility to someone else. This understanding reinforces the importance of the contracting officer's role in managing contracts, ensuring that actions required by the regulations are executed properly and in alignment with federal acquisition policies. Other roles, like the program manager or budgeting officer, may have vital responsibilities in the acquisition process, but their authority does not extend to the enforceability of actions directed by the FAR unless explicitly stated.