Which statement about government contracts is true?

The statement that the government encourages maximum practical commercial use of inventions made under government contracts is accurate. This reflects the intent of federal policies designed to stimulate innovation and ensure that inventions developed with government funding can benefit a wider market. The Bayh-Dole Act, for example, allows small businesses and non-profit organizations to retain the rights to inventions they develop under federal funding, detailing incentives for the commercialization of such inventions. This approach facilitates the transition of government-funded research into practical applications that can enhance public welfare and stimulate economic growth.

The other options do not align with the government's approach to intellectual property rights associated with contracts. Recognizing rights in data developed at private expense is part of maintaining a fair legal environment that respects private investment. The notion that the government can mandate contractors to include copyrighted works in their submissions is contrary to the principles of intellectual property rights and respect for creators. Lastly, the idea that the government restricts all inventions made under government contracts is misleading, as many inventions can be commercialized and used broadly as long as certain conditions are met.